Seal any MP4, MOV or AVI file with a qualified cryptographic timestamp before uploading, and hold court-admissible copyright proof under eIDAS and ZertES.
In April 2026, a Lausanne-based documentary filmmaker licensed 40 minutes of original footage to a European streaming platform. The licensing contract required proof of creation date. The filmmaker submitted a YouTube upload timestamp from the previous year. The platform's legal team rejected it: YouTube is not an accredited timestamp authority, and the upload date proves only when the file was posted, not when the work was created. The deal stalled for six weeks. The filmmaker lost the first payment window, worth EUR 18,000, while the platform waited for compliant creation proof.
Seal your video before you upload it. Every time you post an MP4, MOV, or AVI to YouTube, TikTok, or Instagram, the platform strips the embedded metadata that might have established when you created it. What remains is the platform's upload timestamp, recorded by a third party you do not control and carrying no legal weight in a copyright dispute.
Video files carry embedded metadata: creation date, camera model, GPS coordinates. Filmmakers often assume this data proves authorship. It does not hold up in court.
First, embedded metadata is trivially edited. Any video editor can alter a creation timestamp in seconds. Second, every major platform removes or replaces metadata on upload. YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Vimeo all transcode and repackage your video; the metadata they expose reflects the upload date and the platform's own identifiers, not your original data.
Once your video is live, the file-level metadata is gone from the public version. What you needed was a creation proof that existed outside the platform, before you ever uploaded.
A YouTube "Published" date records when you uploaded, not when you created the work. No court in the EU or Switzerland accepts a platform date as a qualified electronic timestamp. Platforms are not accredited timestamp authorities.
This matters under Berne Convention Art. 5, which establishes that copyright exists at creation, but you must prove when in any dispute. The legal standard requires a qualified electronic timestamp from an accredited Certification Service Provider, cryptographically bound to the exact file content at the moment of sealing.
Your video is never uploaded to Swiss Trust Layer. The process is entirely privacy-preserving.
Swiss Trust Layer computes a SHA-256 hash of the exact binary content of your file: every byte of the MP4, MOV, or AVI. Change a single frame and the hash changes completely. Only the hash travels further.
The hash is submitted to Swisscom Trust Services, which issues a qualified electronic timestamp compliant with RFC 3161, cryptographically bound to your hash and anchored to an independent accredited clock authority. The resulting PAdES-compliant certificate (your hash, the qualified timestamp, and your verified identity) is verifiable at swisstrustlayer.com/validate by any lawyer, court clerk, or licensing team.
eIDAS Art. 41 grants a legal presumption that the data existed at the stated time, enforceable across all 27 EU member states. ZertES Art. 2 provides the equivalent presumption under Swiss law.
Step 1: Keep the original file. Do not compress, re-export, or edit before sealing. The hash is computed on the exact binary. Any change invalidates the seal.
Step 2: Go to swisstrustlayer.com and select your file. The SHA-256 hash is computed client-side in your browser. The video binary is never sent to Swiss Trust Layer's servers.
Step 3: A qualified timestamp is issued. Swisscom Trust Services anchors your hash to an RFC 3161-compliant timestamp, the legally binding moment of creation proof.
Step 4: Download your certificate. The PAdES-compliant certificate holds your file hash, timestamp, and verified identity. Store it with the original file.
Step 5: Share the verification link. Anyone can verify your certificate at /validate, admissible as evidence, no action required from you.
If the Lausanne filmmaker had sealed each video file before uploading to YouTube, the licensing conversation would have taken ten minutes. A QTSP-issued qualified timestamp, anchored via RFC 3161 to a UTC time source and backed by Swisscom Trust Services, would have shown the platform's legal team exactly when each file existed in its exact binary form. The eIDAS Art. 41 statutory presumption would have applied. No rejection, no delay, no missed payment window.
The timing rule is absolute: seal before you share. Once a video is on a public platform, any subsequent seal proves only that you held the file at a later date. Seal before uploading to YouTube, TikTok, Vimeo, or Instagram. Seal before sending a rough cut to a studio or licensing footage commercially. Licensing teams increasingly require creation provenance as a contractual condition. Sealing.
eIDAS Art. 41 grants a legal presumption that the data existed at the stated time, operative in all 27 EU member states. Challengers must rebut this presumption.
ZertES Art. 2 provides equivalent protection under Swiss law.
Berne Convention Art. 5 establishes that copyright arises at creation with no registration required. But when ownership is challenged, you must prove the creation moment, and a qualified timestamp is more reliable than file metadata and more authoritative than platform records.
Can I seal a MOV or AVI file, or only MP4?
MP4, MOV, and AVI are all supported, along with MKV and WebM. The SHA-256 hash captures the exact binary content of any container format, and the resulting qualified electronic timestamp is admissible under eIDAS Art. 41 and ZertES Art. 2 regardless of file type.
What if I edit the video after sealing?
Editing produces a different binary and a different hash. You must seal the edited version separately. The earlier seal on the original still establishes the prior creation date.
Does sealing prove artistic ownership, or just that a file existed?
Sealing proves a specific file existed in its exact form at a specific moment, with you as the sealing party. Prior existence is the foundational requirement for asserting copyright and qualifying for licensing deals that require provenance.
Can I use a YouTube upload date as evidence instead?
No. Platform dates carry no legal presumption under eIDAS Art. 41 or ZertES Art. 2. Platforms are not accredited timestamp authorities.
Is my video content private when I seal it?
Yes. Swiss Trust Layer never receives or stores your video file. Only the SHA-256 hash is processed. It cannot be reverse-engineered into the original video.
The Lausanne filmmaker recovered the deal six weeks late, after having an IP lawyer produce a sworn statement and additional evidence at a cost of EUR 3,200. The seal would have. For a 40-file library, that is CHF 200 against EUR 3,200 in remediation costs, plus the EUR 18,000 first-payment window that arrived a quarter late. Seal before you upload. Platform timestamps prove only the upload moment. A qualified timestamp proves creation. per document. Legal framework details at /eidas and /zertes.
Protect your work with Swiss Trust Layer AG
Seal your intellectual property with a court-proof e-Seal backed by Swisscom Trust Services.
Book a Free Demo
The AI Act Makes Your Opt-Out Their Obligation. It Still Isn't Your Proof
The EU AI Act tells model providers to go looking for your opt-out and to respect it once they find it. That obligation is real and it is theirs. What it can't do is answer the question a dispute puts to you: what did you make, and when.
A German Appeal Court Threw Out a Copyright Opt-Out Because a Machine Couldn't Read It
A notice in your terms of use tells a human reader you object to AI training. A German appeal court has held that a reservation in that form doesn't satisfy Article 4(3) DSM, because the crawler it addressed was never able to read it.
An NDA Doesn't Date Your Idea. Here's the Gap That Costs Agencies Pitches
An NDA tells a prospect they cannot repeat what you shared. It says nothing about when you actually came up with it, or what happens once the pitch leaves the room. That is the gap that costs agencies their best ideas.
A Landmark US Copyright Fight Over AI Art Is Heading to Trial. What to Have Ready Regardless of the Verdict
Andersen v. Stability AI is a major US copyright case over how AI image generators were trained. The jury trial is now set for April 2027. No verdict answers the question every photographer and illustrator already has to answer for themselves: can you prove what you made, and when.
September, in one checklist: what's live, what's changing, what to fix first
This week closed with a record AI copyright settlement, a new EU disclosure law in force, and a jury trial underway that could reshape how image generators are treated. Here is a practical checklist covering what to check and fix in September, from AI content disclosure to dated proof of your own work.
