Skip to main content
Standards

Why a Member-Owned Collecting Society Is Running a Copyright Register

In short

A register that proves who made a work, and when, only matters if you trust whoever keeps it. That is the quiet reason the Swiss Copyright Registry sits inside ProLitteris, a collecting society owned by the creators it serves, rather than inside a platform that could be sold, pivot, or disappear.

Why a Member-Owned Collecting Society Is Running a Copyright Register — Swiss Trust Layer

Most tools that promise to prove you made something are built by companies whose main interest is the company. That is not a criticism, it is just what a company is. It raises money, it looks for a return, and one day it is acquired, changes direction, or shuts down. None of that is a problem for a photo-editing app. It is a real problem for a record that is supposed to still mean something in a dispute years from now.

So the interesting question about the Swiss Copyright Registry is not what it does. It is who keeps it. The answer is ProLitteris, and the reason that matters takes a minute to explain.

What a collecting society actually is

A collecting society is not a startup and not a government office. It is a membership organisation owned by the people whose rights it manages. ProLitteris is Switzerland's collecting society for text and visual arts. Authors, journalists, photographers, illustrators and publishers are its members, and it exists to represent them, license their work to users, and pass the resulting remuneration back to them.

Two features of that structure matter here. It is member-owned, so its incentive is to serve the creators who own it rather than to extract value from them. And it is durable, in the way institutions with a defined public function tend to be, rather than in the way a funded company hopes to be.

Why that suits a register

A register of authorship has one job that is harder than it sounds: to still be there, unchanged and trusted, on the day someone needs it. That day might be next month or in fifteen years. Everything about a good register is really about surviving that gap.

A collecting society is built for exactly that gap. It already holds long-term relationships with rights holders. It already sits between creators and the people who use their work, which is precisely where a question of authorship gets asked. And because its members own it, the record it keeps is not a product it might one day decide to stop offering.

There is also a quieter point about neutrality. When the keeper of a register has no stake in who wins a dispute, the record it produces is easier to rely on. A society that represents all its members equally is closer to that position than a platform selling a subscription.

Who does what

The register is not a single company doing everything, and it is worth being precise about the parts, because each one is chosen for what it is good at.

ProLitteris runs the register and operates the escrow, the part that keeps a recoverable copy of your sealed work. As the collecting society, it is the institution that stands behind the record.

Swisscom Trust Services provides the storage the deposits sit in, held in Switzerland and independent of any ordinary cloud.

Swiss Trust Layer provides the technology: the sealing, the qualified timestamp, the identity check, the ISCC content code and the content labels that make each record specific and verifiable.

None of those three could sensibly do all three jobs. The point of the arrangement is that the institution with the long-term duty to creators is the one that keeps the record, and the parts that need specialised infrastructure are handled by the people who build it.

What it means for a creator

If you register a work, the practical difference is this. The proof you get is not tied to the continued existence of a product. It is tied to a Swiss collecting society whose reason to exist is to represent creators, backed by storage and technology that are separate from any one company's fortunes.

That does not make the proof stronger in a technical sense. A qualified timestamp is a qualified timestamp wherever it sits. It makes the proof more likely to still be there, and still be trusted, when the argument finally happens. For a record whose entire value is measured in years, that is not a detail. It is close to the whole thing.

The plain version

A register is only as good as your confidence that its keeper will still be standing, and still be neutral, when you need it. A member-owned collecting society is a stronger answer to that than a company is. That is why the register sits where it sits.

Protect your work with Swiss Trust Layer AG

Seal your intellectual property with a court-proof e-Seal backed by Swisscom Trust Services.

Book a Free Demo

Related Articles

The Year-End Audit Trail: Which Records Prove What, Before Auditors Ask
Compliance

An auditor asks for one December invoice as it looked on the day it was booked. Which records will you be asked to show at year end, and what can each kind of evidence prove about a file: that it existed then, that it is unchanged, who signed it, and who the person was.

October 1, 2026Read Article →
What Happens If You Lose Every Password: Recovery Tied to You, Not a Login
IP & Copyright

Any service can send a reset email. None of them help once you have lost that email too, along with the phone, the password manager and every backup code. ESCROW Storage is bound to your passport-verified identity, so getting your sealed files back does not depend on any credential you still hold: you can retrieve them in person.

September 30, 2026Read Article →
Four Dates Sit on the Q4 Calendar. One of Them Decides How a Dispute Goes
Compliance

Two obligations still land before the end of the year and two have been running for a while. Three of them are things you comply with. The fourth changes what happens once you are already in an argument, because it lets a court order you to produce your own evidence. That is the one worth preparing for.

September 29, 2026Read Article →
We Said September Would Not Be Quieter. Here Is What Changed
Compliance

At the end of August we argued that September only looks like a quiet month, because the obligations that landed earlier in the year keep running whether or not there is a headline date attached. September is over. Here is what actually moved, what moved on this platform, and what is still open going into the last quarter of the year.

September 28, 2026Read Article →
One Code Identifies the Work Without Exposing the File: ISCC, Explained
Product & Technology

A qualified timestamp proves when a file existed. A hash proves it is exactly that file, byte for byte. Neither one answers a different question: is this the same work after someone resizes it, re-saves it, or re-encodes it for a different platform. That is the gap the International Standard Content Code closes, and it does it without anyone handing over the underlying file.

September 27, 2026Read Article →