SES, AES or QES.
Pick the signature level your document actually needs.
What is a qualified electronic signature?
A qualified electronic signature, or QES, is the highest of the three signature levels defined by eIDAS in the EU and ZertES in Switzerland. It is created with a qualified certificate after the signer's identity has been verified, and the law treats it like a handwritten signature.
Most documents do not need one. When the question is what a file contained at a point in time rather than who committed to it, a qualified timestamp answers it on its own. This page walks you to the right choice.
The three signature levels in one screen
Both regimes grade electronic signatures on the same three-step ladder. The level decides what a court makes of the signature, not how it looks on the page.
Simple electronic signature
Any electronic mark: a typed name, a scanned signature image, a checkbox.
Admissible as evidence, and little more. It proves almost nothing about who signed or whether the document changed afterwards.
Advanced electronic signature
Uniquely linked to the signer, capable of identifying the signer, created under the signer's sole control, and bound to the document so any later change is detectable.
Solid evidence for everyday business documents. It does not stand in for a handwritten signature where the law demands one.
Qualified electronic signature
An advanced signature created with a qualified signature creation device and based on a qualified certificate, issued after identity verification.
The level with handwritten equivalence, on both sides of the border.
The equivalence rests on two provisions. In the EU, eIDAS Article 25 gives a qualified electronic signature the equivalent legal effect of a handwritten signature. In Switzerland, OR Art. 14 para. 2bis puts a qualified electronic signature on the same footing as a handwritten one, provided it carries a qualified timestamp and comes from a provider recognised under ZertES, with differing statutory or contractual arrangements reserved.
When you need a QES, and when a timestamp is enough
The decision comes down to what the document has to prove later.
A QES is the right tool when the signature itself carries legal weight
- The law attaches a written-form requirement to the document, and you want the electronic route that satisfies it.
- A counterparty, regulator or internal policy demands verified signer identity, not just a name on a line.
- The document commits a person: contracts, board resolutions, powers of attorney, HR agreements.
A qualified timestamp is enough when the question is what existed, and when
- You need dated proof that a file existed in exactly this state: designs, source code, manuscripts, research data.
- Nobody has to commit to anything. The file is the evidence, not a signature under it.
- You want the proof without putting anyone through identity verification.
The timestamp route has its own legal backing. Under eIDAS Article 41(2) , a qualified electronic timestamp carries a presumption of the accuracy of its date and time and of the integrity of the data bound to it, and Article 41(1) says an electronic timestamp is not denied legal effect merely for being electronic. The file itself carries a dated record a court can work with, no signing ceremony required.
Why one seal covers both regimes
Swiss Trust Layer seals through Swisscom Trust Services, which is accredited under ZertES and operates as a qualified trust service provider under eIDAS. One sealing flow therefore produces a signature or timestamp that meets the Swiss standard and the EU standard at the same time.
To be precise about what that claim is: it is a statement about the technical standard the seal meets through Swisscom's accreditations, not a statement about where Swiss Trust Layer is present as a business.
- Swiss side: recognition under ZertES, the basis the OR Art. 14 para. 2bis equivalence builds on.
- EU side: qualified trust service provider status under eIDAS.
- Practical effect: no second workflow, no second provider, no re-signing for the other jurisdiction.
What you receive
Every seal produces the same set of artefacts, whether it is a qualified signature or a qualified timestamp.
The sealed PDF
Your document with the signature or timestamp embedded, ready to file, send or archive.
A verifiable certificate
A record of what was sealed, when, and through which provider. It stands on its own and travels with the document.
A public check without login
Anyone you hand the document to can verify it on the public validate page, without an account and without contacting you.
Decide in one table
Find your situation in the left column. The middle column is what answers it.
| Your situation | What answers it | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| I need to sign a contract that carries legal form requirements | Qualified electronic signature | Start a qualified signature |
| I need to prove I had this file at this time | Qualified timestamp | Seal the file |
| Several people need to sign the same document | Multi-signature workflow | Set up co-signing |
Questions before you start
What makes a signature qualified rather than just electronic?
Is a qualified electronic signature valid in both Switzerland and the EU?
Do I need a QES for every document?
Can other people check a sealed document without an account?
Can several people sign the same document?
Start with the document in front of you
Sign it at the level it needs, or seal it with a qualified timestamp. Either way you walk away with a certificate anyone can check.
Start a qualified signature